Logo

The Bears’ NFC Defensive Player of the Week offered an $11M salary request to the Packers but was rejected by Green Bay, then agreed to a $7.5M contract extension with the Bears.

Chicago, Illinois – 16/03/2026

The story surrounding linebacker D'Marco Jackson took an unexpected turn this week after reports revealed the unusual sequence of events that led to his contract extension with the Chicago Bears.

Jackson ultimately signed a two-year extension worth $7.5 million to remain in Chicago, a deal that was initially framed as a loyalty decision over a larger offer from the rival Green Bay Packers. But insiders later indicated the situation unfolded quite differently.

https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/19lHBoYdAqjLq4i1h5CCDpbIbuyGIbSmRaF2oKcKTIQN8HaRtF6gTQuVOQje4YZAl8de5X9X38r9XtIVDSek2m6dxNcU9DH4BgkCg0zqe-jx8D6tWKFqINlKfKVv9dpcsowsObNMC3D8qRy4cayAd50QrYy9oC-hmVIkWdwC68aC8m8Eo7eLgchZcm89-ppc?purpose=fullsize


According to league sources, Jackson’s representatives first approached Green Bay during the early stages of free agency seeking a deal worth approximately $11 million. The Packers, however, were not interested in moving forward with the proposal and declined to pursue the linebacker at that price point.

With Green Bay no longer an option, Jackson quickly returned to Chicago and finalized a two-year extension worth $7.5 million to remain with the Bears through the 2027 season.

Shortly after the deal became official, Jackson spoke publicly about his decision — and his comments sparked plenty of attention across NFL social media.

“The Packers offered more money, but Chicago is where I want to build my legacy. We’ve built something special here, and I’m not ready to walk away from that.”

The quote was intended to highlight loyalty to the Bears’ locker room and the defensive culture the team has been building. However, the narrative shifted quickly once reports surfaced that the Packers had actually declined Jackson’s initial contract request.

That revelation did not go unnoticed by fans.
https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/f7RtLG6S8Z1qCkk1zfRfarZFCXUgpae2-KnV3EX2zsas9qbPETSJcv_Gypxa1c33gROgdnTVVj95SIFGq7zB6N0xjAXIlgdNnM3uzsYo0BG70C1T1sQM8wPEsakFedTlBJBo-BhVzPpAsoDCvSNFwsvljFs3A52HAW0G5IB8UlaNx_AvgAY8579FuOm-fXl7?purpose=fullsize

Across social media platforms, many Bears supporters jokingly leaned into the irony of the situation, playfully teasing the storyline that Jackson “turned down more money” despite the fact that Green Bay had reportedly never finalized such an offer.

Some fans responded with memes suggesting the linebacker had “rejected a deal that didn’t exist,” while others simply celebrated the fact that Chicago retained a valuable defensive contributor regardless of how the negotiations unfolded.

Lost in the humor, however, is the reality that Jackson remains an important piece of Chicago’s defensive depth chart.

After joining the Bears in 2025, the linebacker carved out a significant role on special teams and as a rotational defender. He appeared in 16 games last season, recording 43 total tackles, one sack, one interception, and a fumble recovery while stepping in during key moments when the linebacker unit dealt with injuries.

For the Bears, the extension ensures continuity in a defense that has steadily improved over the past two seasons.

For Jackson, the deal means stability and another opportunity to continue developing within the system that helped revive his career.

And for NFL fans watching the situation unfold online, the entire saga delivered something the league rarely lacks during free agency season — a little unexpected comedy mixed with contract drama.

Packers Superstar Jordan Love Faces Boycott After Claiming Children Shouldn’t Be Exposed to LGBTQ-Themed Cartoons, Despite Explaining He Meant No Hostility Toward Anyone
Green Bay, Wisconsin – Jordan Love, the star quarterback for the Green Bay Packers, sparked a major controversy after stating that children should not be exposed to LGBTQ-themed cartoons. These comments quickly spread on social media, generating a wave of strong reactions. "My point is not to attack anyone, but to express concern about the natural development of children," Love shared while explaining his stance. He emphasized that children should be allowed to develop their identities without being overly influenced by complex topics. However, despite Love clarifying his intentions, these comments still resulted in intense backlash. Some people called for a boycott of Love and any content related to the Packers on social media platforms. The wave of boycotts extended beyond just fans and also spread to sports commentators. Meanwhile, some defended Love, arguing that he had been misunderstood. They stated that Love was simply expressing his personal view about childhood development without intending to offend any community. However, the controversy continued to escalate. "He was just sharing his perspective on raising children. People are jumping to conclusions without fully understanding his message," one of Love's fans posted on social media. Yet, the debate goes beyond just one individual; it’s about the responsibility of public figures. The controversy revolves around the responsibility of public athletes, especially a franchise QB for the Packers, who has a massive following. Love's comments are seen as having a strong impact on the community and society, particularly as the team is in the process of a successful rebuild and is aiming for a strong playoff push. Currently, Green Bay Packers has not issued any official statement regarding the incident. Jordan Love has also not made any further comments beyond the remarks that sparked the discussion. The situation continues to develop, and this controversy remains a hot topic across media outlets.      

Latest Posts